La bataille de l'imprimé

Il est difficile d'exagérer l'ampleur de la révolution que nous sommes en train de vivre et la tourmente dans laquelle est entraîné inexorablement le livre. Celui-ci n'est déjà plus le vecteur du savoir qu'il a été depuis plus de cinq millénaires. Le bouleversement dont nous sommes témoins sera plus radical que l'invention de l'imprimerie et de plus longue portée que le passage du volumen (ou rouleau de papyrus) au codex (ou cahier cousu et ancêtre de notre livre).Pour Sandrine et Hélène Arwe

Similar 5-year HCC occurrence in Tenofovir- and Entecavir-treated HBV chronic infection in the French AFEF/ANRS CO22 Hepather cohort.

International audienceBackground: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection results in a high risk of cirrhosis and its complications, cirrhosis decompensation (DC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver transplantation (LT), death or any of these outcomes (composite endpoint [CE]). Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) such as tenofovir or entecavir are associated with a reduction in these complications.Aim: To compare the impact of tenofovir and entecavir on these outcomes in patients treated for HBV infection and included in the prospective Hepather cohort.Methods: All patients with HBV infection who had received tenofovir or entecavir for more than 6 months at or after entry in the ANRS CO22 cohort were selected. Patients with HDV and HCV co-infection or prior liver event were excluded. Incidence rates of events were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPW).Results: The cohort included 1800 patients (986 tenofovir and 814 entecavir). Median follow-up was 4.2 years. The incidences of HCC, DC, LT, ACD, LRD and CE were not different between tenofovir- (1.8 (0.9; 3.2), 0.6 (0.2; 1.6), 0.2 (0.0; 0.8), 1.7 (0.8; 3.0), 0.8 (0.2, 1.8) and 4.1 (3.0; 5.4) per 1000 person-years) and entecavir-treated patients (1.6 (0.7; 3.0), 0.7 (0.2; 1.8), 0.2 (0.0; 1.0), 3.0 (1.7, 4.8), 0.5 (0.1; 1.5) and 5.0 (3.3; 7.2)) per 1000 person-years, respectively.Conclusion: The risk of liver-related events or death was not different between tenofovir- and entecavir-treated patients in this large prospective cohort of predominantly non-cirrhotic French patients.Trial registration number: NCT019553458